explaingit

you-dont-need/you-dont-need-lodash-underscore

19,167JavaScriptAudience · developerComplexity · 2/5MaintainedLicenseSetup · easy

TLDR

A reference guide showing which Lodash and Underscore functions can be replaced with native JavaScript, plus an ESLint plugin to flag unnecessary library usage.

Mindmap

mindmap
  root((repo))
    What it does
      Side-by-side comparisons
      Native JS alternatives
      ESLint plugin included
    Coverage areas
      Arrays and collections
      Strings and objects
      Functions and utilities
    Use cases
      Reduce dependencies
      Audit existing code
      Learn modern JS
    Tech stack
      JavaScript
      ESLint
      npm

Things people build with this

USE CASE 1

Remove Lodash or Underscore from a project to reduce bundle size and dependencies.

USE CASE 2

Set up ESLint rules to automatically catch places where you're using library functions that have native equivalents.

USE CASE 3

Learn which modern JavaScript features replace common utility library patterns.

USE CASE 4

Decide whether to add Lodash or Underscore to a new project by checking if native methods already cover your needs.

Tech stack

JavaScriptESLint

Getting it running

Difficulty · easy Time to first run · 5min
MIT license, use freely for any purpose, including commercial use, as long as you keep the copyright notice.

In plain English

Lodash and Underscore are popular JavaScript utility libraries that developers add to their projects to handle common tasks like filtering arrays, sorting collections, or manipulating strings. The problem is that modern JavaScript, specifically ES5 and ES6, has quietly added many of these same capabilities as built-in, native features that don't require any external library at all. This project is a reference guide that shows, side by side, which Lodash or Underscore functions can simply be replaced with plain JavaScript that already ships in the browser. Instead of importing a library to do something like find an item in an array, you can often use a native method that does the same thing with no extra dependency. The guide covers arrays, collections, functions, strings, objects, and more. It also includes an ESLint plugin, a code analysis tool you can add to your JavaScript project, that automatically flags spots in your code where you're using a Lodash or Underscore function that has a built-in native alternative. You install it via npm and configure it once, and it points out where you can simplify. You'd reach for this when auditing a project to reduce its dependency footprint, when onboarding to a codebase that heavily uses these libraries, or when deciding whether to add them in the first place. The tech stack is JavaScript, with ESLint as the tooling layer.

Copy-paste prompts

Prompt 1
Show me how to replace lodash.map with native JavaScript in my project.
Prompt 2
I want to set up the ESLint plugin from you-dont-need-lodash-underscore to flag unnecessary lodash usage in my codebase.
Prompt 3
What's the native JavaScript equivalent for lodash.filter and lodash.find?
Prompt 4
Help me audit my code to find all places where I'm using underscore functions that have built-in alternatives.
Prompt 5
I'm refactoring to remove lodash, what native methods should I use for common operations like grouping, sorting, and transforming arrays?
Open on GitHub → Explain another repo

Generated 2026-05-18 · Model: sonnet-4-6 · Verify against the repo before relying on details.