Analysis updated 2026-08-10 · repo last pushed 2021-12-08
Automatically flag inconsistent indentation or unused variables on pull request lines before a human reviewer sees them.
Configure the action to block merging when serious errors are found, enforcing code quality before changes land.
Set it to only check newly added code so pre-existing issues don't clutter review feedback.
Use it as an automated first-pass reviewer so senior engineers can focus on logic and architecture.
| opf/action-eslint | 00kaku/gallery-slider-block | 0verflowme/weirdhta | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last pushed | 2021-12-08 | 2021-05-19 | 2022-06-16 |
| Maintenance | Dormant | Dormant | Dormant |
| Setup difficulty | easy | easy | moderate |
| Complexity | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| Audience | developer | general | developer |
Figures from each repo's GitHub metadata at analysis time.
Requires an existing ESLint configuration in your repository and a GitHub Actions workflow file.
This project is a GitHub Action that automatically checks your JavaScript code for common mistakes and style problems every time someone opens a pull request. Instead of forcing a human reviewer to spot every minor formatting inconsistency or potential bug, the tool leaves comments directly on the specific lines of code in the pull request, pointing out the issues it found. Under the hood, it combines two existing tools. The first, ESLint, is a widely used checker that scans JavaScript for errors, bad practices, and deviations from your chosen style rules. The second, called reviewdog, takes the problems ESLint finds and translates them into review comments directly on your GitHub pull request. This makes the feedback loop feel like a colleague is reading your code and leaving notes, except it happens automatically and instantly. Any team working with JavaScript or TypeScript in a GitHub repository would benefit from adding this. For example, if a junior developer submits a pull request with inconsistent indentation or a variable that is never used, this action will flag those issues on the exact lines in question before a senior engineer even looks at it. This saves reviewers from nitpicking style details, letting them focus their time on the actual logic and architecture of the changes. The tool is highly configurable through simple settings. You can decide how strict it should be, choosing to report issues as warnings or errors, and whether a found mistake should block the pull request from merging entirely. You can also tell it to only flag problems in the new code being added, rather than complaining about pre-existing issues elsewhere in the project, which keeps the feedback relevant and focused on the current work.
A GitHub Action that automatically reviews JavaScript code in pull requests by flagging style issues and mistakes directly on specific lines, so human reviewers can focus on logic instead of formatting.
Mainly JavaScript. The stack also includes JavaScript, ESLint, reviewdog.
Dormant — no commits in 2+ years (last push 2021-12-08).
No license information was provided in the explanation, so usage rights are unknown.
Setup difficulty is rated easy, with roughly 5min to a first successful run.
Mainly developer.
This repo across BitVibe Labs
Verify against the repo before relying on details.