explaingit

lixin4ever/conference-acceptance-rate

4,742Jupyter NotebookAudience · researcherComplexity · 1/5Setup · easy

TLDR

A reference table of acceptance rates for major AI and ML research conferences from around 2012 onward, showing how selective each venue is and how submission volumes have grown.

Mindmap

mindmap
  root((repo))
    What it does
      Track acceptance rates
      Count submissions
      Show trends over time
    Conference Areas
      NLP venues ACL EMNLP
      Vision CVPR ICCV ECCV
      ML NeurIPS ICML ICLR
      AI AAAI IJCAI
    Data Points
      Acceptance percentage
      Papers accepted
      Total submissions
    Audience
      Researchers
      PhD students
      AI community
Click or tap to explore — scroll the page freely

Code map

Detail Auto

An interactive map of this repo's files and how they connect — its source is parsed live in your browser. Click Visualize to build it.

filefunction / class

Things people build with this

USE CASE 1

Look up how selective a specific AI conference like NeurIPS or CVPR has been over the past decade before deciding where to submit a paper.

USE CASE 2

Compare acceptance rates across NLP, vision, and ML conferences to find the most competitive venues.

USE CASE 3

Track how submission volumes at major AI conferences have changed since 2012 using the included trend chart.

USE CASE 4

Explore the data programmatically in the Jupyter Notebook to create custom visualisations or filter by year or venue.

Tech stack

Jupyter NotebookPython

Getting it running

Difficulty · easy Time to first run · 5min

Browse the README tables directly on GitHub, or open the Jupyter Notebook locally with `jupyter notebook` to query and visualise the data.

No license explicitly stated, treat as a reference data collection.

In plain English

This repository is a reference collection of acceptance rates for major AI research conferences going back to roughly 2012. Acceptance rate is the percentage of submitted research papers that a conference agrees to publish, which is a common proxy for how competitive or selective a venue is. The data is organized by research area: natural language processing conferences (ACL, EMNLP, NAACL, COLING), computer vision conferences (CVPR, ICCV, ECCV), machine learning and learning theory conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, COLT, AISTATS, UAI), general AI conferences (AAAI, IJCAI), and data mining conferences (KDD, WWW, SIGIR, and others). For each conference edition, the entry shows the acceptance percentage, the number of accepted papers, and the total number of submissions. Where conferences distinguish between long papers and short papers, both figures are listed separately. The repository also includes a chart image showing acceptance rate trends over time across these venues. A Jupyter Notebook is included, which suggests the data may also be available in a format that can be queried or visualized programmatically, though the README itself is primarily the tables. The audience for this data is researchers deciding where to submit their work, students curious about competition levels at different venues, or anyone tracking how AI conference submission volumes have grown over time. Submission counts at venues like NeurIPS and CVPR have roughly tripled over the decade shown, while acceptance rates at most conferences have stayed in the 20-30 percent range.

Copy-paste prompts

Prompt 1
Based on the conference-acceptance-rate dataset, which AI venues have had the lowest acceptance rates over the past 5 years, NeurIPS, ICML, or ICLR?
Prompt 2
I'm a PhD student deciding between submitting to ACL or EMNLP. Use the acceptance rate data to compare both venues across the years available.
Prompt 3
Write Python code using the Jupyter Notebook data from conference-acceptance-rate to plot acceptance rate trends for NeurIPS and CVPR on the same chart.
Prompt 4
From the conference-acceptance-rate tables, what is the trend in total NeurIPS submissions from 2015 to the most recent year available?
Prompt 5
Which conference in the data has the highest acceptance rate on average, AAAI, IJCAI, or ICLR?
Open on GitHub → Explain another repo

← lixin4ever on gitmyhub — every repo by this author, as a profile.

Verify against the repo before relying on details.