Analysis updated 2026-05-18
Install the skill in Claude Code and paste in a negotiation email thread to see what each party's real priorities and constraints are.
Run counterpart-analysis on a meeting transcript before a follow-up call to spot gaps between what was said and what participants likely want.
Use the competing-hypotheses output to prepare calibrated questions that help confirm or rule out your read of someone's position.
| joneslloyd/agent-skills | 195516184-a11y/esp32-mcp-parenting-robot | a-bissell/unleash-lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Language | — | — | Python |
| Setup difficulty | easy | moderate | hard |
| Complexity | 1/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Audience | pm founder | general | researcher |
Figures from each repo's GitHub metadata at analysis time.
Requires Claude Code or a compatible agent with SKILL.md support, install with one command via the plugin marketplace.
This repository is a collection of skills designed to extend AI coding assistants such as Claude Code. Skills in this context are small, structured instruction sets that tell the AI how to perform a specific task when you invoke a command. The repository also serves as a Claude Code plugin marketplace, meaning you can install its skills directly inside Claude Code with a single command rather than copying files by hand. The first and currently only skill included is called counterpart-analysis. You give it a transcript of a conversation, an email thread, a chat log, or a description of a situation involving other people, and it tries to work out what each person actually wants below the surface. Rather than summarizing what was said, it focuses on underlying interests, incentives, and constraints that may not be stated openly. The skill builds its analysis carefully. Every claim about a person's motives is tied back to a specific quote or observable pattern in the material. Each piece of information is labeled to show whether it came directly from the text, from background you supplied, from the skill's own reasoning, or from an untested assumption. The skill also generates two or three competing explanations for the same behavior, ranks them, and suggests a concrete question or test to figure out which one is correct. It includes guardrails to avoid over-confident readings, especially when the material is thin or the conversation involves cultural or language differences. The skill is designed for understanding situations and preparing for conversations, not for writing manipulation scripts. An explicit ethics boundary is part of the design. Installation works through Claude Code's plugin system, through OpenCode by copying the skill folder, or for claude.ai users by downloading a packaged file and uploading it in a conversation. The repository is MIT licensed, meaning you can use, copy, and modify it freely.
A Claude Code plugin that adds a counterpart-analysis skill: paste in any conversation or email thread and get a structured breakdown of what each participant actually wants, with evidence labels and competing hypotheses.
MIT license: use, copy, modify, and distribute freely for any purpose, including commercially, as long as you keep the copyright notice.
Setup difficulty is rated easy, with roughly 5min to a first successful run.
Mainly pm founder.
This repo across BitVibe Labs
Verify against the repo before relying on details.