explaingit

hzwer/writingaipaper

Analysis updated 2026-07-03

3,728Audience · researcherComplexity · 1/5Setup · easy

TLDR

A practical writing guide for researchers preparing to submit papers at AI conferences, covering contribution framing, paper structure, figure clarity, and how to handle reviewer rebuttals.

Mindmap

mindmap
  root((Writing AI Papers))
    Paper Structure
      Abstract and intro
      Related work
      Method section
      Experiments
    Polishing
      Readability
      Clear figures
      Common mistakes
    Rebuttal Process
      Reviewer response
      Revision strategy
    Contribution Types
      New insight
      New capability
      New explanation
    Audience
      New researchers
      PhD students
Click or tap to explore — scroll the page freely

Code map

Detail Auto

An interactive map of this repo's files and how they connect — its source is parsed live in your browser. Click Visualize to build it.

filefunction / class

What do people build with it?

USE CASE 1

Structure your first AI conference paper using the guide's advice on framing contributions, writing abstracts, and organizing related work.

USE CASE 2

Improve a nearly finished paper using the readability checklist and figure-clarity tips before the submission deadline.

USE CASE 3

Prepare a reviewer rebuttal by following the guide's practical advice on responding to criticism and revising effectively.

USE CASE 4

Use the takeaway summaries at the end of each section to quickly refresh best practices before a deadline.

How does it compare?

hzwer/writingaipaper0xsyr0/oscpfrankiesardo/icepick
Stars3,7283,7283,728
LanguagePowerShellClojure
Setup difficultyeasyeasyeasy
Complexity1/51/52/5
Audienceresearcherops devopsdeveloper

Figures from each repo's GitHub metadata at analysis time.

How do you get it running?

Difficulty · easy Time to first run · 5min

In plain English

This repository is a written guide for beginners trying to publish research papers at AI conferences. It is aimed at people who have done experiments and have results to share, but are not sure how to turn that work into a proper academic paper. The authors are researchers who have published at major venues and want to pass on practical advice that textbooks rarely cover. The guide covers two main areas. The first is how to build a paper from scratch: figuring out what your core contribution is, structuring the abstract and introduction, writing the related work section, and presenting your method and experiments clearly. The second area is about polishing the details: improving readability, making figures clear, checking the writing for common mistakes, and handling the revision and rebuttal process after a paper is submitted and reviewers respond. A recurring theme in the guide is the difference between publishing results and sharing genuine new knowledge. The authors push back against the idea that beating a benchmark score is enough. They argue that the most lasting papers are ones that surface a clear insight, introduce a new capability, or offer an explanation for something people did not understand before. They also spend time on the practical side of finishing a paper under deadline pressure, including when the first draft should be done and how to divide work among collaborators. The guide is written in English and was also published across several Chinese platforms, where it reached a large audience. It is not a software tool, it contains no code to run. The value is entirely in the text itself, which is structured as a long article with takeaway summaries after each section to make it easier to skim and revisit.

Copy-paste prompts

Prompt 1
Based on the Writing AI Papers guide, help me write a strong abstract for my paper that clearly states my core contribution and why it matters to the field.
Prompt 2
I have experimental results showing my model beats a baseline. Help me decide if that constitutes a real contribution worth submitting, using the criteria from the Writing AI Papers guide.
Prompt 3
Help me write the related work section of my AI paper so it clearly positions my contribution without dismissing prior work unfairly.
Prompt 4
A reviewer said my paper lacks novelty. Help me draft a rebuttal using the advice from the Writing AI Papers guide on handling critical feedback.
Prompt 5
Using the Writing AI Papers guide, help me plan how to divide writing tasks with two collaborators so we can finish the paper a week before the deadline.

Frequently asked questions

What is writingaipaper?

A practical writing guide for researchers preparing to submit papers at AI conferences, covering contribution framing, paper structure, figure clarity, and how to handle reviewer rebuttals.

How hard is writingaipaper to set up?

Setup difficulty is rated easy, with roughly 5min to a first successful run.

Who is writingaipaper for?

Mainly researcher.

Open on GitHub → Explain another repo

This repo across BitVibe Labs

Scan in gitsafehub Deploy in gitdeployhub hzwer on gitmyhub

Verify against the repo before relying on details.