Analysis updated 2026-07-03
Structure your first AI conference paper using the guide's advice on framing contributions, writing abstracts, and organizing related work.
Improve a nearly finished paper using the readability checklist and figure-clarity tips before the submission deadline.
Prepare a reviewer rebuttal by following the guide's practical advice on responding to criticism and revising effectively.
Use the takeaway summaries at the end of each section to quickly refresh best practices before a deadline.
| hzwer/writingaipaper | 0xsyr0/oscp | frankiesardo/icepick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | 3,728 | 3,728 | 3,728 |
| Language | — | PowerShell | Clojure |
| Setup difficulty | easy | easy | easy |
| Complexity | 1/5 | 1/5 | 2/5 |
| Audience | researcher | ops devops | developer |
Figures from each repo's GitHub metadata at analysis time.
This repository is a written guide for beginners trying to publish research papers at AI conferences. It is aimed at people who have done experiments and have results to share, but are not sure how to turn that work into a proper academic paper. The authors are researchers who have published at major venues and want to pass on practical advice that textbooks rarely cover. The guide covers two main areas. The first is how to build a paper from scratch: figuring out what your core contribution is, structuring the abstract and introduction, writing the related work section, and presenting your method and experiments clearly. The second area is about polishing the details: improving readability, making figures clear, checking the writing for common mistakes, and handling the revision and rebuttal process after a paper is submitted and reviewers respond. A recurring theme in the guide is the difference between publishing results and sharing genuine new knowledge. The authors push back against the idea that beating a benchmark score is enough. They argue that the most lasting papers are ones that surface a clear insight, introduce a new capability, or offer an explanation for something people did not understand before. They also spend time on the practical side of finishing a paper under deadline pressure, including when the first draft should be done and how to divide work among collaborators. The guide is written in English and was also published across several Chinese platforms, where it reached a large audience. It is not a software tool, it contains no code to run. The value is entirely in the text itself, which is structured as a long article with takeaway summaries after each section to make it easier to skim and revisit.
A practical writing guide for researchers preparing to submit papers at AI conferences, covering contribution framing, paper structure, figure clarity, and how to handle reviewer rebuttals.
Setup difficulty is rated easy, with roughly 5min to a first successful run.
Mainly researcher.
This repo across BitVibe Labs
Verify against the repo before relying on details.