explaingit

finaspirant/llm-wearable-agentic-eval-pipeline

Analysis updated 2026-05-18

0Jupyter NotebookAudience · researcherComplexity · 5/5LicenseSetup · hard

TLDR

A pipeline for generating, annotating, and scoring AI agent behavior step by step, demonstrated on wearable device data.

Mindmap

mindmap
  root((agentic-eval-pipeline))
    What it does
      Generates test data
      Scores annotator agreement
      Evaluates agent trajectories
    Tech stack
      Python
      Jupyter
      Argilla
    Use cases
      Compare agent frameworks
      Score reasoning steps
      Detect bad annotators
    Audience
      AI researchers
      ML engineers

Code map

Detail Auto

An interactive map of this repo's files and how they connect — its source is parsed live in your browser. Click Visualize to build it.

filefunction / class

What do people build with it?

USE CASE 1

Generate synthetic wearable sensor logs with privacy protections for testing agent pipelines.

USE CASE 2

Score step-by-step agent reasoning instead of only judging the final answer.

USE CASE 3

Compare LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen, and OpenAI Agents SDK on identical tasks.

USE CASE 4

Measure annotator agreement on agent trajectories using Path-Invariant Agreement.

What is it built with?

PythonJupyter NotebookArgillaDockerLangGraphAutoGen

How does it compare?

finaspirant/llm-wearable-agentic-eval-pipelinebobymicroby/fastbookdavidbeard741/openusd
Stars00
LanguageJupyter NotebookJupyter NotebookJupyter Notebook
Last pushed2022-12-11
MaintenanceDormant
Setup difficultyhardeasyeasy
Complexity5/52/52/5
Audienceresearchervibe coderdeveloper

Figures from each repo's GitHub metadata at analysis time.

How do you get it running?

Difficulty · hard Time to first run · 1h+

Full annotation workflow needs Docker, Elasticsearch, and the Argilla server running locally.

Free to use, modify, and distribute for any purpose, including commercial use, as long as you keep the copyright notice.

In plain English

This project is an end to end pipeline for curating, annotating, and evaluating agentic AI systems, meaning AI agents that take a sequence of actions to reach a goal rather than just answering a single question. It is demonstrated using wearable device data such as health alerts, ambient conversations, location triggers, and calendar reminders, but it is built to work with any AI system whose behavior is not perfectly predictable. The project targets a specific gap: many teams can watch what their AI agents do, but have no rigorous way to judge whether the agent did it correctly. The pipeline covers five parts. First, a synthetic data generator creates realistic wearable sensor logs while applying differential privacy through calibrated noise. Second, an inter-rater reliability calculator measures how much human or AI annotators agree with each other, using several standard statistics plus a new metric the project introduces called Path-Invariant Agreement. That metric is meant for cases where an agent can reach a correct outcome through more than one valid sequence of steps, situations where ordinary agreement scoring would wrongly count different valid paths as disagreements. Third, a step-level annotation pipeline scores each individual step in an agent's reasoning chain rather than only judging the final result. Fourth, a benchmark runner compares four different agent frameworks, LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen, and OpenAI Agents SDK, running the same tasks through each one and measuring things like token usage and how errors are recovered from. Fifth, an evaluation tool breaks an agent's run down into five stages: understanding the intent, planning, calling the right tools, recovering from mistakes, and the final outcome, scoring each stage separately. The codebase is mostly Jupyter notebooks with supporting Python modules, and it needs Python 3.11 or newer. A local annotation setup is included using the Argilla tool and Docker, for teams that want humans reviewing agent trajectories directly. The full README is longer than what was shown.

Copy-paste prompts

Prompt 1
Walk me through setting up the Argilla annotation server for this agentic eval pipeline.
Prompt 2
Explain how Path-Invariant Agreement differs from standard inter-rater reliability metrics.
Prompt 3
Help me run the benchmark_runner.py comparison across LangGraph, CrewAI, and AutoGen.
Prompt 4
Show me how the five-layer trajectory scorer breaks down an agent run for evaluation.

Frequently asked questions

What is llm-wearable-agentic-eval-pipeline?

A pipeline for generating, annotating, and scoring AI agent behavior step by step, demonstrated on wearable device data.

What language is llm-wearable-agentic-eval-pipeline written in?

Mainly Jupyter Notebook. The stack also includes Python, Jupyter Notebook, Argilla.

What license does llm-wearable-agentic-eval-pipeline use?

Free to use, modify, and distribute for any purpose, including commercial use, as long as you keep the copyright notice.

How hard is llm-wearable-agentic-eval-pipeline to set up?

Setup difficulty is rated hard, with roughly 1h+ to a first successful run.

Who is llm-wearable-agentic-eval-pipeline for?

Mainly researcher.

Open on GitHub → Explain another repo

This repo across BitVibe Labs

Verify against the repo before relying on details.